It’s About Time!

Women Join the Ranks of LCI Membership

While  American mankind…emphasis  on “man”… has  successfully progressed from  one  milestone  to  another, “womankind”, on the other hand , has  been  left  in the lurch and  struggles  to play  catch-up.  Striving  to attain  equal  parity on  a  number  of  basic  human  rights has proven  to be extremely elusive over  many  years  of  frustration.

From the Founding  of our Republic, men  have  been  empowered with  the  right to  vote.  Women  had  no  such  right,  and it  was  not  until   nearly  150  years later… and  only  after  many  bitter and  violent  confrontations  on  behalf  of  woman  suffrage… that  the  hard  earned  passage  of  the  19th  Amendment  in  1920  to  allow  women  to  vote  became  reality.

Only  three years  earlier, on the  October 8-9-10, 1917, first convention of  Lions International  in  Dallas, Texas,  a measure  was  approved  for  the  by-laws  to admit  business  women  as  full  members.  This came  about  because  Dr.  W.P.  Woods, the founder of  the International Association of Lions Clubs…a  man  well  ahead  of  his  time…  had  allowed  his  charter Lions  Clubs to  do  so.  But  the gesture  was  short  lived. A  year  later  at the second  convention  in St. Louis,  it  was  rescinded.  A  woman  was  admitted  into the  Austin  Downtown  Founder  Lions Club (Texas), but  by  the time the third  convention in Chicago (1919)  rolled around,  she was  dismissed.  Melvin  Jones  would  see to  it  during  all  the  years  he  had  the  power,  no  woman  would be  admitted into  LCI.  But  in  defense  of  Melvin,  he was  not  alone.  Paul  Harris, the  founder  of  Rotary  International  in 1905, was equally  adamant  in  keeping  women  out of  his  organization. And  so it  was  with  the  Kiwanis  group.  “For  Men  Only”  was the sign  of  the times.  Women  need  not  apply.

Difficult  to  understand  why  it  would  take  another  67  years  for  women  to reach  another  lofty  plateau  since  they  earned the  right  to  vote.  Once  again, it  came  about  through  many  struggles, and  protests  were  becoming  more  vocal  and  frequent.  Unbeknownst   to  anyone  in  1977,  fate  would   set   in  motion in  a  most  unusual  manner ,  the  restoration  of  yet  another  right  for women:  to  join  the  all-male  bastion  of  civic  organizations.

Our  story  begins  1977  in  Duarte,  California,  a  less  than  20,000  member community in Los  Angeles  County  situated on  the  historic “Route  66” highway. The  Rotary Club of  Duarte undertook  the  bold  decision  to  admit three women into  the  club  in  clear  violation of  Rotary’s  all-male policy of  their constitution. Early in 1978,  after  refusing  Rotary’s  demand  that  they  be  expelled  from  the  club,  Duarte’s  charter  was  revoked.  Dr. Richard  Key,  president  of  the  local club,  stated  that  “there’s   no  way”  the  women  members  will  be  asked   to resign. Key had  mentioned  that two-thirds  of  business  and  professional people in  Duarte  were  women.  Rotary  was  described  as  an  international  service organization  of  business  and  professional  men— and  men  only.

The  Duarte  chapter  wanted  to  appeal  at  the  Rotary  convention  in  Tokyo  in  May,  1978. Result:  By  a  1,060  to  34  vote,  Rotary  International  upheld  their decision  expelling  the  Duarte  club  for  admitting  three  women.

From  the  time  it  was  expelled  in 1978,  it  was  not  until  1983  when  a  court  became  available  to hear  the  case  of  the  now  “Ex-Rotary Club”  of  Duarte . The  Los  Angeles  Superior  Court  Judge  Max  F.  Deutz,  however,  ruled  against Duarte  based  on “California  law .”  He  ruled  that  Rotary  International  was not a  business   establishment,   so  the  ban  on  discrimination  did  not  apply. “ Furthermore,” Deutz  wrote, “ the  plaintiffs  knew  they  were  violating  the  by-laws at  the outset. Their  ‘unclean’  hands  prohibit  their  (winning).  In any  case,  they were  never  misled  to  their  detriment.”

So  much  for  Judge  Deutz’ ruling.  The “Ex-Rotary  Club” of  Duarte  appealed  to  the California  Court  of  Appeals— and WON !  This  court  ruled  that  Rotary  was subject to  a state law  prohibiting  sex  discrimination in business  establishments. Rotary  International  appealed  to  the  California  Supreme  Court  which  refused to  hear  it.  It  was  now  up  to  the  U.S.  Supreme  Court  to  decide  the  issue once  and  for  all. 

And  that  they  did.  By  a  7-0  vote  with two  abstaining  on  May 4, 1987,  it upheld  the  Court  of  Appeals  ruling  and  laid  down  guidelines  that  appeared  to  cover  other  popular  service  clubs  as  well.  In  the  meantime, the  Duarte Club was  reinstated. And  it  wasted  no time  in  making  a  profound  statement:  It  was the  first  Rotary  International  club  to  elect  a  woman  president.

It  should  be  noted  that  the  International  Association  of  Lions  Clubs,  and  a  coalition  of  other  clubs,  entered  the  case  on  Rotary’s  behalf.

The  Supreme  Court   ruling  reverberated  through  all  the  major  all-male  clubs.  The  writing  was  on  the  wall  and  Lions  Clubs  International   knew   it  all  too  well.  LCI  had  to  deal  with  a  number  of  cases  before   the  1987  ruling  that concerned  a  few  clubs   that  did  “sneak”  female  members  in,  but  were  ultimately  caught . One lady was  a  member for  SEVEN  years  and was  detected   only  after she  ran  for president  of her club. Using only the first initial of her first name,  LCI later discovered that the “L” stood  for  “Lola”.  Nevertheless,  LCI   was  not  going  down  easy.  Initially  suggesting  that  admission of  women  should  be  on  a club-to-club   basis,  it  resisted  making  a  blanket  ruling.

With all  eyes  on  the  Taipei,  Taiwan  Lions  International  convention  of  1987, an anticipated action did  take  place.  On  the  last day  of  the  convention, a vote was  taken with  the  Associated  Press  reporting  that  it  was “ overwhelming”  in favor of  allowing  women  to  join.  Still,  twenty-two percent  were  in  favor  of  maintaining   the  status-quo. Well,  ladies…you  lost  a  number  of  battles, but  you  won  the war.  One   can  only  speculate  how  much  more  progress  has  been  generated  in  the  last 30  years  as  a  result  of  your  membership.  One  thing  is  certain:  Lionism   is  so  much  better  off  with  you  on  board.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *